Radio, Television & Cell Phone Radio Wave Interference
Antenna reception of television and radio waves did experience some amounts
interference and static during late fall and winter of 2002. In the spring and
summer of 2003, outages due to magnetic diffusion from the Earth’s core in the
telecommunications cellular and satellite industry caused sporadic losses with
increasing occurrences into 2004, but
were hidden to the public due to redundant satellite systems. Key personal in the top
telecommunication and broadcasting companies when presented with these internal
rising concerns will skirt the issue or have no clue to initial or follow up
questions as to the real cause, although will have to satisfy the angry
customers intensifying as we proceed into fall 2004.
Television reception by antenna already disrupted on channel 3 and quickly fixed
throughout the
nation beginning in Sept.2002 is going to take a back seat to cellular service,
since most of America has cable TV. The captains of industry, lawyers, vice
presidents, and government officials, all consider this means of communications
essential to maintaining an open line of contact to their executive and staff
members. The status quo will provide studies and data pointing to sunspots
and a new super cycle of solar flares as one cause when interference in the Earth’s core
disrupts the radio wave spectrum at an increasing linear rate. Using the
established 11-year sunspot cycle to correspond to this activity will not fool
any scientist, but the general public will buy the news releases. The current cycle has already peaked in 2000 and the excuse of a
new mega cycle falls short. A mega cycle has never been recorded, so why the
assumption to cover what is unknown? One only has to compare the current sun
spot count to historical records, a variable that the average scientist can
record with a simple telescope on his own. Do not except any data gathered by
the establishment when you can verify it yourself with a telescope and a careful
count, which was the norm in the 18th and 19th century.
The extremes in weather will not match the sun spot variance. Although, the up
tick in weather disturbances will match the exponential increase in distance
traveled to Earth from, the static position between both stellar objects the
dark One and the Sun of the incoming 12th planet. Statements
explaining as possible causes such global warming and sunspots may sway the
common man, but some scientists shall consider all variables and arrive at a
fresh conclusion. Upon close examination, the appearance of sunspots and the
high-energy subatomic particles emitted by the Sun, bombard the daylight or the
side of the Earth facing the Sun, but the interference is just as intense on
both sides of the globe on a twenty-four hour basis. So how is this scenario
possible, if the night side of the global atmosphere is out of the Sun’s
particle stream for half of the days’ rotational period? Atmospheric
dispersion is not the answer, since gravity and ionosphere, which bend and
deflect particles affecting the day and night side, would decrease the particle
stream emitted from the Sun exponentially in density once passing the day-night
line as one’s position approached the equator, thus creating a quiet zone near
it. The cause is the magnetic field of the 12th planet interfering
with the magnetic alignment of the Earth’s core and counter rotation. Scientists have yet to
discover that magnetic fields of the planets & the Sun and their influence
affect and are affected by other nearby stellar systems, not just the local area
our solar system. Equilibrium in this sector of our solar system has been static
for approximately 1700 years. Enter in a wildcard, the 12th planet,
which has arrived in the inner solar system, its maximum velocity will approach a
fractional speed of light due to gravity-assisted movement, yet slow to a crawl
due to the repulsion force
thus stunning
astronomers. This same gravity particle flow (hint) is the basis for high-speed interstellar
travel. Rebuttals will be presented using comets as an example, stating
their elliptical orbital paths and approach velocities don’t come close to
fractional light speeds. So why is their discrepancies? When a comet approaches
the inner solar system it is attracted by gravity, their mass is insufficient to
invoke the repulsion force, but the particle stream emanating from the Sun, the
solar wind significantly reduces approach velocities. The 12th planet
with a mass approximately 24 times that of Earth plunges towards the Sun
unabated except for the repulsion force, which isn’t invoked, until it reaches
the inner edge of the solar system Pluto’s orbital path. This is the point
where approach speeds diminish rapidly at an exponential rate why still falling
towards the Sun. The solar wind, while providing nothing more than minimal
resistance, is just an annoyance. It is a force, but does not affect the orbital
velocity or path. There will be statements of denial, presentations of technical
orbital paths that cannot fit a passage of the 12th planet in the
near future, backed up with decades of scientific research, but their isn’t any
reference material explaining an orbital approach of approximately 30 billion
miles in a matter of 6 months. The 12th planets’ dead on approach
will make it difficult to judge its true distance, giving the skeptics and
experts the edge until the last fleeting moments, by then
it will
be too late.
All Rights Reserved: © Copyright 2003
Main
Menu