The
Capture Theory of the Moon
Prerequisites
Universal Laws of Gravity & Repulsion
Many theories have been presented to the field of astrophysics as to origin of the Moon. Was it formed as a band gaseous matter that coalesce around Earth. Did it break away from Earth itself as a bulge as the Earth rotated? Did an object hit the Earth and an ejected piece of Earth became the Moon? Finally was the Moon captured on a close approach of Earth? There is an element of truth in most of the theories, but we will clarify what did occur.
Locked in controversy is the “Capture Theory“ and it is this theory we will examine, because certain aspects are true. It states that the Moon’s original orbit or drift brought it close enough to the Earth’s gravitational field to be “captured“. In a close examination of this theory, there are several factors, which need to be considered. Starting with the angle of orbital approach, the encounter would have to have low level of inclination or almost a parallel orbit. The factor of time and sufficient gravitational attraction must be within these narrow parameters to allow a new gravitational relationship to develop with the moving center of an orbiting Earth, which can permanently alter and capture its orbital path. Other factors overlooked are the velocity and the distance of the passage during flyby. This would leave little room for error. Under today’s laws of Gravity, the Moon would have either collided with the Earth during a fast steep or a tight centerline approach. Alternately, in a wide approach, the Moon would break free of the Earth’s gravitational field and continue moving through the solar system due to its sling orbit until its next encounter. The chance occurrence that the Earth captured the Moon in this latter scenario is has little chance.
If the current views of the capture theory did not occur, then what did happen? Mankind’s theory, “The Capture Theory of the Moon” is correct that the Moon was captured, but incorrect on how this event was achieved. Nevertheless this occurrence can be explained under the new laws of gravity and the repulsion force.
Geologically a short time ago within our solar system, the path of the Moon did come into direct contact of what is to become the Earth’s gravitational field. This was a chance encounter, but one that was destined. Our solar system was vastly different, as there were many planets residing in the asteroid belt, some water planets. Our Sun constantly using the fusion process to create light, heat and the solar wind lost mass during the fusing of matter over time. Introducing a wandering object which periodically passes through our system and its distance of passage is determined by the current snapshot of the Sun' mass. The primary force dictating the distance is the repulsion force of the passing object generates, which is a constant as its mass does not change significantly to affect motion and the Sun, variable decreasing over time as a function of fusion and available stellar mass. The object, the 12th planet is explained in detail as to the orbit, the gravitational sources affecting its orbit and the processes affecting its orbital path. The primary concern occurs only as this object pieces the orbital plane at acute angle. Timing and orbit distance through the ecliptic plane varies as function of the repulsion force tied to the mass of the Sun. In a more detailed description, planetary system and its accompanying moons, do not follow mankind's definition of orbital dynamics, but is based on particle movement.
As the Sun's mass decreased, the orbit of this planet passed through our solar system, simultaneously the point of orbital plane piercing and orbital distance of the proto Earth coincided over many passages. On a rare occurrence, the orbit of this traveling planet and the proto-Earth planet came within close proximity of each other. The Moon was the trailing object of many caught in the gravitational coiled string like wafting moons in the wake of this moving planet. Its position on the fringes of the gravitational field made it susceptible to outside gravitational fields, which the initial or proto version of the Earth played a part. The Earth’s gravitational field was strong enough to rip free the Moon from the grips of the 12th planet as it wafted to an outer extreme. Once free, Earth’s gravity altered its orbital movement through space inward towards it.
Looks get into specifics of how the Moon was put into a position that lead to a collision with Earth. The 12th planet as it nears the Sun approaches rapidly, slows quickly due the repulsion force and dithers about the ecliptic plane due particle movement and magnetic forces on its poles related to the Sun before ejecting out of our solar system, but it follows the same basic plan. The origin of the Moon is based about the trailing moons of the 12th, which vary about 3 primary orbital tubes (tube are a descriptive final format that the orbital patterns would trace out if mapped in a 3 dimensional format) dependent upon their positions when they were tugged out of the original circular orbits near the dither point between the gravitational anchors of this system as a result of motion. The gravitational attraction towards our inner solar system rearranges an orbital pattern which is circular to a new format trailing behind the moving planet.
Question, are not the planets in our solar system moving about an orbital path, yet the moons related to these planets in motion maintain their circular orbits? Yes this is true, but the total complex is pushed by the repulsion force leaving intact the individual forces affecting the planetary moon system as all encounter the same overall balanced force but on a local level the differences play out maintaining orbital rotation of the separate moons. With the 12th planet and its retrograde motion against normal planetary rotation motion in this solar system, it is the gravitational attraction which holds or drags the moons and the repulsion from the Sun stretches the complex of planet and moons.
When near the Sun its motion stalls, so why doesn't the standard circular orbital patterns return to the 12th planet? The repulsion force responsible for orbital motion in this system, first elongates and the variable number of strings containing moons which can vary from 2 to 5, all dependent upon the various moon positions when motion initiates. Secondary the overall blanket repulsion force emitted from the Sun and the returning particle flowing back to both sides of the ecliptic plane intensifying as a function distance towards the Sun. The moons and their positions vary, curling towards the ecliptic primarily dependent whether above or below it. There is additional push back as the outer group or groups also curl out and away evading the 12th planet's repulsion force with a press forward from the Sun. So moons fan out to the rear of movement and curls back towards and away from the 12th at the trailing ends in both outer groups with compression on one side and extension on the other in the direction of orbital motion in this solar system. If a center group is present it just oscillates between the adjacent outer groups.
Motion and wafting is tight as an intense particle movement restricts and compresses motion within the complex of moons. It isn't until 12th is pulled back towards the Sun on its final approach towards Earth due magnetic attraction above the ecliptic position, does the repulsion force build. When the distance of the 12th planet closes with the Sun, the returning particle field of the Sun drives the planet back towards the ecliptic, the closer it is pulled. This forces the attraction to the north pole of the Sun with its 12th south poles to return to a normal side by side alignment, north-south resulting in the potential build up of the repulsion force having no counter to hold it, and like a compressed spring it releases and accelerates the 12th planet out of the solar system at a high velocity.
When the trailing moons pierced the returning intense ecliptic particle field, the groups of trailing strings of moons fanned out with the compression relieved. Our Moon trailed on extreme end and was whipped outward while still within the orbital plane and in this chance encounter moved to the outside of the proto Earth's orbit. Now the 12th planet's gravitational field is accelerating out of the solar system, points the Moon's escape path back inward overcompensating for extreme swing outward. Slightly to the outside of the proto Earth's path, the velocity of the what is to become our Moon during this approach is a result of the gravitational attraction from the fast moving 12th planet. The result is a collision, as the repulsion force generated between what is to become the Earth and the Moon was insufficient to neutralize its momentum. The moving gravitational field altered this path to where the Moon hit off center causing the water and magma to be blasted away on one side. The Moon as a result of the impact fused and melted vast areas of its surface on contact. Dust, magma and some water scattered about the surface of the Moon with a portion of its mass ejected the moon attached to the Earth by a shared magma and mutual gravitational fields. The planets once hit, behave like pool balls due to conservation of momentum and its original orbit was knocked inside of its present position.
The repulsion streams moving in a counter rotational path around the Sun to the motion of the ejected Earth-Moon combination eventually slowed the stopped and reversed direction following the natural orbital rotation of the solar system. The repulsion force pushed the present form of the Earth outwards away from Venus where it settled in an occupied orbit as a new addition mass, combined now with the Earth, the established orbit fanned slightly outward. With Moon tethered to the Earth by magma, the iron nickel core was disrupted by the impact with some parts ejected at the impact zone and rest through the opposing crack on the opposite side of the globe. The crack fused with some of the ejected core matter and retained its magnetic properties. This formation is still present as a part of Earth's geology presently known as the Mid Atlantic Rift. As the core settled and heavy elements coalesce forces which attract areas of the core starts movement it overshoots and the attraction begins again, spin within the core is reestablished thus dragging the crust and planetary rotation returns. The rotational motion causes a centrifugal force that separates the Moon from the Earth until it settled in its present orbit as a balance of gravity and repulsion.
The impact and the capture of our Moon answers many questions related to the solar system and Earth, so lets address some.
The asteroid belt contains objects primarily composed of metals, yet the planetary crusts are vastly different. So what is their source, primordial matter from the Big Bang or space trash from a planetary breakups? The various objects, which at one time occupied the zone between Jupiter and Mars, which was wider than today due to planetary mass pushing out the orbit of Jupiter and a cascading the affect pushing the outer planets, harbored water and terrestrial planets. The asteroids are known to have a heavy concentration of iron-nickel, they were created as a result of the present Moon colliding with the proto Earth. The shockwave ejected core matter and surface debris with energy transferred in proportion to its mass. This resulted in the heavier iron-nickel remaining in the belt while the lighter mass objects were ejected into space as impact meteors, captured by the Sun or just undiscovered due to size and distance. This first set of asteroids was affected by the mass displacement of the primary water planet. Jupiter's orbit now with the associated repulsion force missing from the ejected planet shifts quickly inward forcing part of the asteroid belt in towards the Sun. It then overshoots the equilibrium position and is repulsed by the Sun and is bounced outward until gravity reverses the process. This process permanently affected a set of asteroids with a sinusoidal wave pattern due to the motion of Jupiter until it settled in its present orbit.
When the water planet was hit, what happened to all the water and surface mass with in the impact zone after the collision? A vast amount of surface water as well as surface rock was ejected into space. The initial wave contained both heated and vaporized water in the absence of gravity lighter water equally surrounds surface matter then freezes about the rock. Propelled with great momentum in various directions. Once velocity and an orbit was established for these objects around the Sun, thus the origin of the comets.
The impact zone shattered one half of what was to be Earth's surface, what features on Earth's was created by this occurrence? The primary remnant or impact crater is now seen as the Pacific Ocean basin. The depression popped and cracked the crust on the opposing side of the Earth, thus the one super continent and ocean. The magma flow initiated in the opposing crack, now the Mid Atlantic Rift, spreads the plates thus compresses the Pacific forcing its basin down with the weight of the water, which turn pushes more magma out of the rift until an equilibrium in the future is achieved between both oceans.
The Earth was cooled quickly as vaporized water condensed in the upper atmosphere and rained down upon the molten surface. Vast valleys and canyons were carved out about the surface as torrential rains fell accelerating the erosion process that washed away a geological dust sediment layer.
How were the features of the Moon affected after the impact? Because the Moon and Earth were temporarily linked and are of different origin compositions, the Moon shares some common surface rocks, material and deposited frozen water. Evidence is still seen on the Moon in the form of lunar maria, smooth areas of basaltic plains, which became molten after impact and re-solidified as semi-featureless seas on the contact side surround by rough terrain. The metamorphic process of compression and heat present, but process of creation different. A comparison to the back side of the Moon away from the impact zone shows a surface basically still intact with its original features.
Where are the
volcanoes responsible for mankind's theory for the creation of the lunar plains
and why is there no activity? More important how can you justify the plains
forming primarily on the side facing Earth? Both sides of the Moon receive the
same amount of sunlight eliminating a thicker crust for one side. If the Moon
rotated, pressure applied to the crust would exploit the weak points at any
position about the Moon's surface, but it does not rotate.
The plains were created recently in geological time as the lack of crater
impacts reveal. Consider, that core has ceased to generate heat and motion, all
of which is needed for volcanism or rotation.
Laser measurements bouncing off the reflectors left on the Moon by the
astronauts verify it is receding from the Earth, what is the cause?
The accretion of objects meteorites and dust like
All Rights Reserved: © Copyright 2000, 2009
Mankind's Explanation on the Capture of the Moon